HERON V OTHER OPTIONS

How Heron compares to other options

Consultant, coach, outsourcing provider, technology specialist, project manager, change manager or another employee? They can all be useful. They overlap in places, but they are strongest at different things and leave different responsibilities with you.

This guide is designed to make the choice easier before you spend money, add headcount or start another project.

AT A GLANCE

How the different options compare

There is plenty of overlap between these roles. The useful difference is where each one is strongest, how involved they usually become, and how much of the improvement journey they can cover.

Capability
Heron
Consultant
Business coach
Outsourcing
Technology specialist
Project manager
Change manager
Internal operations leader
Diagnose operational issues
✓
✓
○
×
○
○
○
✓
Design processes, systems or operating improvements
✓
✓
○
×
✓
○
○
✓
Hands-on implementation
✓
○
×
✓
✓
✓
○
✓
Project coordination and delivery
✓
○
×
○
○
✓
○
✓
Change and adoption support
✓
○
○
×
○
×
✓
✓
Ongoing leadership support
✓
○
✓
×
×
○
○
✓
Weekly accountability and challenge
○
○
✓
×
×
○
○
✓
Add repeatable delivery capacity
○
×
×
✓
○
○
×
✓
Specialist technology implementation
○
×
×
×
✓
×
×
○
Permanent operational ownership
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
✓
✓ Usually a core part of the role○ Often possible, depending on the provider or engagement× Generally not the role's main purpose

This is a guide, not a rule. Individual providers can work more broadly or narrowly than the typical role shown here.

The options

What each option gives you, and what it doesn't

None of these options is inherently better. The question is whether the model matches the problem you actually have.

Business / operations consultant

Strongest at

Analysis, outside perspective, problem definition, process review and recommendations.

Common trade-off

The work can stop at the recommendation, leaving implementation, coordination and adoption with you.

Best fit

You need experienced thinking and already have the internal capacity to implement it.

Business or practice-management coach

Strongest at

Challenge, priorities, decision-making, accountability and momentum.

Common trade-off

Coaching generally assumes you and your team will do the operational redesign and implementation.

Best fit

You broadly know what needs to happen and need support to follow through.

Outsourcing / offshore support

Strongest at

Adding capacity, reducing internal workload and moving repeatable work to an appropriate cost base.

Common trade-off

Outsourcing does not automatically remove unnecessary work or fix poor process design.

Outsourcing a broken process still leaves you with a broken process.
Best fit

The work is necessary, repeatable and reasonably well designed; capacity or cost is the main constraint.

Technology specialist

Strongest at

System selection, configuration, integration and implementation.

Common trade-off

Technology providers naturally approach the problem through a technology lens.

Technology can automate a good process. It can also automate confusion.
Best fit

You have established what capability the business actually needs and require specialist technical expertise.

Project manager

Strongest at

Scope, milestones, dependencies, risks, resources and disciplined delivery.

Common trade-off

Technical delivery does not automatically create the intended business outcome.

Finishing the project is not the same as realising the benefit.
Best fit

The initiative is already defined and the main need is organised delivery.

Change manager

Strongest at

Readiness, communication, capability, adoption and reinforcement for the people affected by change.

Common trade-off

Change management normally begins once the proposed change is reasonably clear; it is not always there to determine whether the underlying operational solution is right.

Best fit

You know what is changing and need help making sure people can and will work differently afterwards.

Internal operations leader

Strongest at

Permanent ownership, day-to-day operational leadership, diagnosing issues and improving the business from inside.

Common trade-off

A strong internal operations leader can diagnose, design and implement across the business. The trade-off is permanent cost, recruitment risk and needing enough ongoing work to justify the role.

Best fit

You need continuing operational ownership and there is enough permanent work and responsibility to justify a dedicated role.

Heron Operations
Heron Operations

Senior thinking kept close to the work.

Strongest at

Working across the gap between advice and execution: understand what is getting in the way, design a practical response, help implement it and support adoption.

Common trade-off

Heron is deliberately senior-led and hands-on. It is not designed to provide large consulting teams, unlimited delivery capacity or permanent operational management.

Best fit

The problem or solution touches people, process, technology, marketing or management, and you need an experienced person who can both work out what needs changing and stay involved in getting it done.

Where Heron fits

Advice is only useful if something changes.

Heron works alongside you to improve how the business actually operates. The person helping understand the problem stays close to the design, implementation and adoption rather than handing the work off and disappearing.

1DiagnoseUnderstand what is actually getting in the way.
2DesignShape a practical response that fits the business.
3DeliverHelp turn the decision into working change.
4AdoptSupport the people involved until the new way is working in practice.
Make the problem simpler

Separate symptoms from the things that actually matter so the business is not trying to fix everything at once.

Keep senior expertise close

The thinking and the doing remain connected rather than being separated across layers of people.

Reduce the work you inherit

A recommendation that simply creates another owner-managed project is only partly useful.

Think through change risk

Consider people, process, systems, controls and customers before implementation creates unintended consequences.

Stay involved through adoption

A solution creates value when people actually use it and the improvement holds after the initial push.