Business / operations consultant
Strongest at
Analysis, outside perspective, problem definition, process review and recommendations.
Common trade-off
The work can stop at the recommendation, leaving implementation, coordination and adoption with you.
Best fit
You need experienced thinking and already have the internal capacity to implement it.
Business or practice-management coach
Strongest at
Challenge, priorities, decision-making, accountability and momentum.
Common trade-off
Coaching generally assumes you and your team will do the operational redesign and implementation.
Best fit
You broadly know what needs to happen and need support to follow through.
Outsourcing / offshore support
Strongest at
Adding capacity, reducing internal workload and moving repeatable work to an appropriate cost base.
Common trade-off
Outsourcing does not automatically remove unnecessary work or fix poor process design.
Outsourcing a broken process still leaves you with a broken process.
Best fit
The work is necessary, repeatable and reasonably well designed; capacity or cost is the main constraint.
Technology specialist
Strongest at
System selection, configuration, integration and implementation.
Common trade-off
Technology providers naturally approach the problem through a technology lens.
Technology can automate a good process. It can also automate confusion.
Best fit
You have established what capability the business actually needs and require specialist technical expertise.
Project manager
Strongest at
Scope, milestones, dependencies, risks, resources and disciplined delivery.
Common trade-off
Technical delivery does not automatically create the intended business outcome.
Finishing the project is not the same as realising the benefit.
Best fit
The initiative is already defined and the main need is organised delivery.
Change manager
Strongest at
Readiness, communication, capability, adoption and reinforcement for the people affected by change.
Common trade-off
Change management normally begins once the proposed change is reasonably clear; it is not always there to determine whether the underlying operational solution is right.
Best fit
You know what is changing and need help making sure people can and will work differently afterwards.
Internal operations leader
Strongest at
Permanent ownership, day-to-day operational leadership, diagnosing issues and improving the business from inside.
Common trade-off
A strong internal operations leader can diagnose, design and implement across the business. The trade-off is permanent cost, recruitment risk and needing enough ongoing work to justify the role.
Best fit
You need continuing operational ownership and there is enough permanent work and responsibility to justify a dedicated role.
Senior thinking kept close to the work.
Strongest at
Working across the gap between advice and execution: understand what is getting in the way, design a practical response, help implement it and support adoption.
Common trade-off
Heron is deliberately senior-led and hands-on. It is not designed to provide large consulting teams, unlimited delivery capacity or permanent operational management.
Best fit
The problem or solution touches people, process, technology, marketing or management, and you need an experienced person who can both work out what needs changing and stay involved in getting it done.